The Relevance of the 2016 Turkish Criteria and its Implications for Determining the Beginning of the Lunar Months in Indonesia

Authors

  • Fairuz Sabiq Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Mas Said Surakarta
  • Muhammad Himmatur Riza Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Mas Said Surakarta
  • Masjupri Masjupri Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Mas Said Surakarta
  • Andi Mardian Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Mas Said Surakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/iclehr.v2i2.76

Keywords:

Astronomical Analysis, Hijri Calendar, Lunar Month, Rukyat Criteria, Turkish Criteria

Abstract

The determination of the beginning of the lunar month is an important issue in religious practice and the establishment of the Hijri calendar in Indonesia. The diversity of imkan rukyat criteria used across countries necessitates an evaluation of international standards, including the 2016 Turkish Criteria, which are considered more progressive with parameters of a minimum crescent altitude of 5° and an elongation of 8°. This article examines the relevance of the 2016 Turkish Criteria within the astronomical and jurisprudential context of Indonesia, as well as its implications for the process of determining the beginning of the lunar month by the government and Islamic organizations. Through literature review, comparative astronomical analysis, and examination of hisab–rukyat practices in recent years, this study finds that the 2016 Turkish Criteria exhibit strong astronomical consistency and can enhance calendar predictability. However, its application in Indonesia may lead to discrepancies with the government’s criteria, which currently require a crescent altitude of 3° and an elongation of 6.4°. These implications include potential differences in month beginnings, the need for harmonizing criteria, and the importance of dialogue between national and international astronomical authorities. This study recommends strengthening astronomical and jurisprudential assessments prior to adopting new criteria and encourages the integration of global data to improve the accuracy of the Hijri calendar in Indonesia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Admin Website. (2024). Beragam kriteria penentuan awal bulan hijriyah di Indonesia. OIF UMSU.

Anwar, S. (2016). Tindak lanjut kalender hijriah global Turki 2016: Tinjauan usul fikih. Tarjih: Jurnal Tarjih dan Pengembangan Pemikiran Islam, 13(2).

BRIN. (2023). BRIN kaji implementasi kriteria baru MABIMS. Brin.Go.Id.

Budiwati, M. A., & A. (2025). Syamsul Anwar’s vision: Establishing a unified global Islamic calendar. AL-AFAQ: Jurnal Ilmu Falak dan Astronomi, 7(1), 67–83. https://doi.org/10.20414/afaq.v7i1.11438

Djamaluddin, T. (2024). Kalender hijriyah global tunggal (KHGT) dalam perspektif astronomi. Tdjamaluddin.Wordpress.Com.

Djamaluddin, T. (2025a). Analisis astronomis kalender 1447 H. Tdjamaluddin.Wordpress.Com.

Djamaluddin, T. (2025b). Dengan pemberlakuan KHGT, hampir setiap tahun terjadi perbedaan awal Ramadhan, Syawal, atau Dzulhijjah. Tdjamaluddin.Wordpress.Com.

Fitriyani, I., Isfihani, & A. O. (2024). Implikasi kriteria imkanur rukyat MABIMS baru terhadap awal bulan kamariah di Indonesia. MEDIASAS: Media Ilmu Syari’ah dan Ahwal Al-Syakhsiyyah, 7(2), 462–482. https://doi.org/10.58824/mediasas.v7i2.197

Hidayat, M. (2018). Aplikasi kriteria kalender Islam global muktamar Turki 2016 dan rekomendasi Jakarta 2017. Al-Marshad: Jurnal Astronomi Islam dan Ilmu-Ilmu Berkaitan, 4(1), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.30596/jam.v4i1.1936

International Union of Muslim Scholars. (2016). The conference for the unification of the international Hijri calendar. Ium-sonline.Org.

Maratus, N. F. (2022). Implementasi neo visibilitas hilal MABIMS di Indonesia. AHKAM, 10(2), 227–250.

Maskufa. (2018). Global Hijriyah calendar as challenges fikih astronomy. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 162, 188–192. https://doi.org/10.2991/iclj-17.2018.39

Millah, M. Z. (n.d.). Melihat lebih dalam kriteria hilal NU dan Muhammadiyah. Nu.or.Id. Retrieved January 6, 2026, from

Moleong, L. J. (2018). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Muhammad Akbar Herman, Qadir Gassing, M. S. (2024). Kontroversi hisab dan rukyat dalam penentuan kalender Islam di era modern pendekatan fikih kontemporer. Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI), 2(4), 617–625.

Munir, B. (2024). Faktor atmosfer dalam visibilitas hilal Badan Meteorologi Klimatologi dan Geofisika (BMKG). Lunggi Journal: Literasi Unggulan Ilmiah Multidisipliner, 2(4), 684–713.

Nasoha, A. M. M. (2025). Perbedaan madzhab dalam menentukan awal bulan hijriah: Studi krisis atas pendekatan hisab dan rukyah. Litera: Jurnal Ilmiah Mutidisiplin, 2(3), 290–301.

Nursodik. (2018). Kajian kriteria hisab global Turki dan usulan kriteria baru MABIMS dengan menggunakan algoritma Jean Meeus. Al-Ahkam: Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Islam, 28(1), 119–140. https://doi.org/10.21580/ahkam.2018.18.1.2353

Putra, M. A. A., & R. A. (2024). Imkanur rukyat MABIMS 3-6,4 criteria according to the hisab rukyat team of Riau Islands Province’s view point. Al-Marshad: Jurnal Astronomi Islam Dan Ilmu-Ilmu Berkaitan, 10(1), 15–34.

Sabiq, F. (2022). The geometry of the position of the sun and the moon when rukyatul hilal. AIP Conference Proceedings.

Sugiyono. (2018). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Syarif, M. R. (2019). Perkembangan perumusan kalender Islam internasional: Studi atas pemikiran Mohammad Ilyas. Gaung Persada (GP) Press.

Ulinnuha, I. N. F. N., & M. (2021). Ittihad and Ikhtilaf al Mathla’ (Discourse and its implementation). Al-Hilal: Journal of Islamic Astronomy, 3(1), 19–42. https://doi.org/10.21580/al-hilal.2021.3.2.8120

Yunus, R. H., & M. (2025). Analisis penentuan awal bulan hijriyah dengan metode pendekatan hisab dan rukyat. Al-Mizan: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Ekonomi Syariah, 12(1), 17–32.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31