Batas Kewenangan Advokat dalam Membela Klien terkait dengan Delik Obstruction of Justice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/prosemnashuk.v1i2.42Keywords:
Advocates, Criminal, Obstruction of JusticeAbstract
The issue of accusations of obstructing or obstructing the legal process carried out by the Advocate in his capacity to defend the client is problematic. The aim of this study is to describe the right to immunity possessed by advocates in the aspect of law enforcement. As well as aiming to find out the criminal liability of Advocates for Obstruction of Justice carried out during the legal process. This writing uses the normative law research method, which is a method or method used in one of the legal research conducted by reviewing the literature and aimed at written regulations. This study show that the right to immunity applies as long as there is good faith that can be held accountable by the Advocate both outside and in the trial in order to protect the legal interests of his client. Meanwhile, in the criminal aspect against Advocates who are proven to have committed obstruction of justice and injured good faith by committing acts that are against the Law to obstruct the law enforcement process.
Downloads
References
Ali, M. (2008). Penegakan hukum pidana yang optimal (perspektif analisis ekonomi atas hukum). Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol15.iss2.art6
Anon. (2025). Definition of impunity. Merriam-Webster Dictionary. Retrieved May 20, 2025, from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/impunity
Gareda, M. S. (2015). Perbuatan menghalangi proses peradilan tindak pidana korupsi berdasarkan Pasal 21 UU No. 31 Tahun 1999 juncto UU No. 20 Tahun 2001. LEX CRIMEN, 4(1).
Hidayat, S., Handrawan, H., Haris, L. O. K., La Sensu, & Arwan, R. (2024). Hak imunitas advokat yang ditetapkan sebagai tersangka dalam menjalankan kuasa. Halu Oleo Legal Research, 6(1), 25–33. https://doi.org/10.33772/holresch.v6i1.740
Huda, C. (2015). Dari tiada pidana tanpa kesalahan menuju kepada tiada pertanggungjawaban pidana tanpa kesalahan. Jakarta: Kencana.
Isra, S., Agustina, S., & Daulay, Z. (2015). Obstruction of justice: Tindak pidana menghalangi proses hukum dalam upaya pemberantasan korupsi. Jakarta: Themis Books.
Loi, S. A. S. (2020). Tinjauan yuridis mengenai hak imunitas seorang advokat yang melakukan tindakan obstruction of justice dalam perkara korupsi (Contoh Putusan Nomor 90/Pid.Sus-TPK/2018/PN.Jkt.Pst) (Skripsi, Universitas Tarumanagara).
Maramis, F. (2012). Hukum pidana umum dan tertulis di Indonesia. Depok: RajaGrafindo Persada.
Penrose, M. (1999). Impunity—Inertia, inaction, and invalidity: A literature review. Boston University International Law Journal, 17(2), 269–310.
Rakinaung, V. Y. (2019). Kajian hukum terhadap pengacara yang dengan sengaja menghalangi, mempersulit jalannya penyidikan, penuntutan serta proses peradilan terhadap terdakwa dalam tindak pidana korupsi. LEX CRIMEN, 8(4).
Saragih, R. F., Pohan, B. J. N., & Tarigan, T. M. (2023). Pertanggungjawaban pidana advokat pada obstruction of justice dalam perkara tindak pidana korupsi. As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga, 5(3), 891–901. https://doi.org/10.47467/as.v5i3.3027
Sinaga, V. H., & Rahmat, R. (2011). Dasar-dasar profesi advokat. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Soejono, & Abdurrahman. (2003). Metode penelitian hukum. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Solehoddin, -. (2015). Menakar hak imunitas profesi advokat. Rechtidee, 10(1), 91–116. https://doi.org/10.21107/ri.v10i1.1141
Sunarso, S. (2015). Filsafat hukum pidana konsep. Depok: RajaGrafindo Persada.
Tambuwun, G. A. (2023). Tinjauan yuridis terhadap upaya menghalangi proses hukum (obstruction of justice) oleh advokat dalam penyelidikan dan penyidikan tindak pidana korupsi. LEX ADMINISTRATUM, 11(5).
Widnyana, I. M. (2010). Asas-asas hukum pidana: Buku panduan mahasiswa. Jakarta: Fikahati Aneska.
Wiyono. (2023). Bantuan hukum. Retrieved May 20, 2025, from https://sulsel.kemenkum.go.id/layanan-2/standar-layanan/hukum-dan-ham-2/bantuan-hukum
Yuherawan, D. S. B. (2020). Obstruction of justice in corruption cases. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 5(1), 225–256. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v5i1.38575
