Pengawasan dan Penegakan Hukum dalam Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Perpajakan di Indonesia

Authors

  • Aidhar Fakhry Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang
  • Agus Widodo Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/prosemnashuk.v1i2.9

Keywords:

Taxation Legal Framework, Tax Revenue Optimization, Tax Avoidance

Abstract

The importance of the taxation system as an economic pillar becomes increasingly prominent in the face of the complexity of international relations and ongoing technological developments. This article discusses the challenges faced by Indonesia in optimizing tax revenue and controlling tax avoidance in the era of globalization. The phenomenon of tax avoidance, particularly involving renowned companies such as PT Bentoel and Google, is a central issue in the context of taxation law in Indonesia. Its impact is significant, with reports from the Tax Justice Network estimating the country's losses at US$4.86 billion per year or approximately IDR 68.7 trillion. Tax avoidance not only has a negative impact on tax revenue but also has the potential to undermine the overall effectiveness of the taxation system. Indonesia is confronted with the expansion of tax avoidance practices, especially by companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange, reinforcing the urgency to address this issue within the existing taxation legal framework. This research adopts a qualitative method with a focus on tax supervision and enforcement to explore efforts to combat tax crimes in Indonesia. Thus, this study is expected to provide an in-depth understanding of the root issues and formulate effective solutions to enhance the effectiveness of Indonesia's taxation system. The research findings are anticipated to serve as a foundation for the development of a more effective national fiscal policy, addressing loopholes in the taxation legal framework, and preventing detrimental tax avoidance practices.

 

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alamsyah, W. (2020). Laporan pemantauan tren penindakan kasus korupsi semester I 2020. Indonesia Corruption Watch. Retrieved November 22, 2023, from https://www.antikorupsi.org/sites/default/files/dokumen/200914-Laporan%20Tren%20Penindakan%20Kasus%20Korupsi%20SMT%20I%202020.pdf

Alexandra, N. (2023). Pengaruh leverage dan transfer pricing terhadap agresivitas pajak. Jurnal Informasi Akuntansi (JIA), 2(2), 33–42.

Annur, C. M. (2023). Pertumbuhan penerimaan pajak RI melambat pada semester I 2023, ini penyebabnya. Informasi, Databoks. Retrieved November 22, 2023, from https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2023/07/28/pertumbuhan-penerimaan-pajak-ri-melambat-pada-semester-i-2023-ini-penyebabnya

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2023). Realisasi pendapatan negara (miliar rupiah), 2021-2023. Informasi. Retrieved November 22, 2023, from https://www.bps.go.id/indicator/13/1070/1/realisasi-pendapatan-negara.html

Christian, F. F., & Aribowo, I. (2021). Pengawasan kepatuhan perpajakan wajib pajak strategis di KPP Pratama Sukoharjo. Jurnal Pajak Indonesia (Indonesian Tax Review), 5(2), 102–107.

Herawati, N. (2019). Penelitian penghindaran pajak di Indonesia. InFestasi: Jurnal Bisnis dan Akuntansi, 15(2), 108–135.

Kemenperin. (2021). Strategi Kemenperin susun kebijakan pengawasan internal. Informasi. Retrieved November 22, 2023, from https://kemenperin.go.id/artikel/22992/Strategi-Kemenperin-Susun-Kebijakan-Pengawasan-Internal

Mahkamah Konstitusi RI. (2023). Pengujian materil Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2021 tentang harmonisasi peraturan perpajakan terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Retrieved November 22, 2023, from https://www.mkri.id/public/content/persidangan/risalah/9262_Risalah-pdf_PERKARA%20NOMOR%2083.PUU-XXI.2023%20tgl.%203%20Oktober%202023.pdf

Moeljono, M. (2020). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penghindaran pajak. Jurnal Penelitian Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 5(1), 103–121.

Naraduhita, D. C., & Sawarjuwono, T. (2020). Corporate social responsibility: Upaya memahami alasan dibalik pengungkapan CSR bidang pendidikan. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing, 8(2), 85–108.

Nasution, A. H. (2017). Penerapan tindak pidana korupsi perspektif administrative penal law. Jurnal Surya Kencana Satu: Dinamika Masalah Hukum dan Keadilan, 7(1), 3–15.

Olivia, I., & Dwimulyani, S. (2019). Pengaruh thin capitalization dan profitabilitas terhadap penghindaran pajak dengan kepemilikan institusional sebagai variabel moderasi. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pakar, 2(2), 48.

Santiago, F. (2017). Penegakan hukum tindak pidana korupsi oleh penegak hukum untuk terciptanya ketertiban hukum. 1, 22–43.

Sasikome, V. (2022). Pembuktian terbalik tindak pidana korupsi berdasarkan Pasal 37 UU No. 31 Tahun 1999 sebagaimana diubah dengan UU No. 20 Tahun 2001 tentang pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi. LEX CRIMEN, 11(6), 15–24.

Situmeang, S. M. T. (2019). Hukum lingkungan efektivitas sanksi pidana dalam penegakan hukum lingkungan. Res Nullius Law Journal, 1(2), 139–148.

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode penelitian kualitatif: Untuk penelitian yang bersifat: Eksploratif, interpretatif, dan konstruktif. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Tandean, A. V., & Nainggolan, P. (2017). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi tax avoidance dengan kepemilikan institusional sebagai variabel pemoderasi. Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis, 9(2), 170–185.

Web, T. (2020). Strategi preventif dan represif dalam proses pengawasan dan pengendalian manajemen ASN. Informasi. Yogyakarta. Retrieved November 22, 2023, from https://yogyakarta.bkn.go.id/artikel/1/2020/09/strategi-preventif-represif-proses-pengawasan-pengendalian-manajemen-asn

Downloads

Published

2024-01-31